Thank You,

: We have a requirement, in this we need to develop a windows service. Our
: client want this to be develop in Java, we are emphasising on .NET 4.0 and
: much more comfortable with .NET. I would like to know some good
comparative
: points for .NET 4.0 over Java in windows service development.
:

You're in the wrong group pal.  This forum is for VB6 and lower.  We do not
deal with anything dot net here.

A windows service is mostly not a memory consuming program so the main
factor is the price. That price is not affected by the tool, but by your
knowledge of the tool.

If your clients wants to do it with Java, then there should be something
which makes that he wants to do it with that.  Find out what are the factors
for him that count that it should be Java.

Probably is only something biased, for that are no argumentations.

JMO

Cor

We have a requirement, in this we need to develop a windows service. Our
client want this to be develop in Java, we are emphasising on .NET 4.0 and
much more comfortable with .NET. I would like to know some good comparative
points for .NET 4.0 over Java in windows service development.

Thank You,

I would recommend posting your question to a .NET forum where you're more likely to get a good
answer:

http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/vbgeneral/threads

Paul
~~~~
Microsoft MVP (Visual Basic)

This one ?............

"I would like to know some good comparative points for .NET 4.0
over Java in windows service development." ....... ?

So there are no good points for using .Net over Java ?

(I understand English isn't your first language, but the use of
aint is typically reserved for the uneducated hillbilly redneck
type, or as a word used in many cliche's.)

You might as well use the plural form of 'you' also...... that
would be 'yous'.

Seems to me that by instance the song

"There aint no mountain high enough" is well know enough.

I had not the idea that the performers of this song where most hillbilly
rednecks
(can be that I don't understand what you mean with it)
Rednecks is in my perception the nick name for the British in the US
revolutionary war.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xz-UvQYAmbg

But if you call the performers of this song uneducated, then we know what
you are.

Cor

--
.NET: It's About Trust!
http://www.*-*-*.com/

--
Tom Shelton

I just did one in C# for another team at my current employer - reason?  
They asked the C++ guys, and they bid like 460 hours... I did the whole
thing start to finish in about 120.

--
Tom Shelton

:-)

Picking Java over .NET?  I wouldn't.  But, I don't have any evidence.

Dick

--
Richard Grier, Consultant, Hard & Software 12962 West Louisiana Avenue
Lakewood, CO 80228 303-986-2179 (voice) Homepage: www.hardandsoftware.net
Author of Visual Basic Programmer's Guide to Serial Communications, 4th
Edition ISBN 1-890422-28-2 (391 pages) published July 2004, Revised July
2006.

You started this in this newsgroup.  .Net is almost native to Windows OS
systems newer then NT5.1 while non NT Windows systems don't even have the
possibility of Windows Server.

But that does not make that a .Net language will be better choice to use
then Java. Microsoft cannot permit themselves (in my perception) to break
any Java running code on a Microsoft OS in the favour of .Net.

Cor

--
.NET: It's About Trust!
http://www.*-*-*.com/

--
.NET: It's About Trust!
http://www.*-*-*.com/

--
.NET: It's About Trust!
http://vfred.mvps.org