JAVA or .NET 
Author Message
 JAVA or .NET

Learn java now and you'll pick up C# no problem...
c# just a java ripoff with a better event model...


Quote:
> I am considering training in programming.  I am looking at long term
> prospects. Which programming language should I learn- Java or VB (leading
to
> C# and .NET)?

> I realise that this news group is visited mostly by VB/M$ enthusiasts.
But
> I am hoping to get an impartial and well rounded opinion/s.

> Thanks in advance.

> Pan



Mon, 19 Jan 2004 16:07:14 GMT  
 JAVA or .NET

Quote:
> Learn java now and you'll pick up c# no problem...
> c# just a java ripoff with a better event model...

Java is the DEVIL... Stay away from it unless your life is threatened...

Ps: I am serious...

Alex.



Mon, 19 Jan 2004 21:36:11 GMT  
 JAVA or .NET
I can't just sit still and let that {*filter*}go unnoticed:

Learn Java first, and you have a solid understanding
of programming in general, and OO in particular.

Java will also take you there on almost any platform.
Just as good as Java, is Python.

After that, VB, BV.net, C# etc. will be a snap, should you
need it.

Dag.

PS!
    I am *not* a Java-fanatic, but have a background from
    Delphi, VB & C. 80% of my daily work is done in VB.

PPS!
    Alexandre... YOur statement doesn't sound very serious.


Quote:
> > Learn java now and you'll pick up c# no problem...
> > c# just a java ripoff with a better event model...

> Java is the DEVIL... Stay away from it unless your life is threatened...

> Ps: I am serious...

> Alex.



Tue, 20 Jan 2004 03:06:56 GMT  
 JAVA or .NET
nooo... Java is well cool... and there's tons of cash in it...
I develop in java , VB, C , Visual C++... and java is where
I make most money...


Quote:
> > Learn java now and you'll pick up c# no problem...
> > c# just a java ripoff with a better event model...

> Java is the DEVIL... Stay away from it unless your life is threatened...

> Ps: I am serious...

> Alex.



Tue, 20 Jan 2004 02:53:56 GMT  
 JAVA or .NET

Quote:
> nooo... Java is well cool... and there's tons of cash in it...
> I develop in java , VB, C , Visual C++... and java is where
> I make most money...

Is it cool cause you like the language or it's cool cause it brings you back
alot of money?

You make alot of cash doing Java cause there isn't much offer. There isn't
much offer because Java is, in my opinion (and that of pretty much everybody
I know), an ill designed language and most of all platform.

BTW I've done Java for 1.5 years and I've got a 7 years background in C/C++,
3 years in VB, as well as many other languages. It was fun the first couple
weeks but when I finally understood the whole concept and realized how bad
they implemented it, it really modified my view of it.

Have you done interface in Java?

Moreover, have you done Swing?

Finally, have you actually developped code that had to be compatible with
multiple platforms?

Last question, what crappy IDE did you use (cause they are all crappy)?

Without going into details, lets just say the answers to these questions are
enough for me to not want to touch Java again with a 10' pole... I have
strong Java experience, and I don't mention it in my resume cause I don't
want to get hired for a Java project.

Alex.



Tue, 20 Jan 2004 03:57:58 GMT  
 JAVA or .NET

Quote:
> Learn Java first, and you have a solid understanding
> of programming in general, and OO in particular.

... after sweating your heart out making crappy programs, indeed. I do agree
that it really throws you in the OO world and doesn't give you much of a
chance to not learn it. BUT, in my opinion too much OO is just like not
enough OO. I really think Java is overkill in the OO department. I know it's
the concept, but still...

Quote:
> Java will also take you there on almost any platform.

Compile anywhere, debug everywhere... That's one other thing I dislike about
Java.. There are like 200 different VMs available out there and most won't
be able to run a big program without messing it up. Last but not least, if a
project is fairly large, it will turn your brand new Intel P4 1800 ghz or
AMD 1.?? (whatever) into a slow machine...

One of the projects I did was a project that could have been done in VB in
half the time and it would have been MUCH more performant (at least 2-3x, I
am 100% sure of that.)

Quote:
> Just as good as Java, is Python.

Can't comment as I have never used it, but I heard good about it.

Quote:
> After that, VB, BV.net, C# etc. will be a snap, should you
> need it.

Indeed, but in my opinion you don't have to learn Java for those languages
to be a snap. Learn a little C/C++ to get a little closer to the machine and
OS, understand the enrironement you work in and how to control it, and
you'll not only have much more fun, but you won't be loosing time on a
language that will be dead 5 years from now...

Quote:
> PS!
>     I am *not* a Java-fanatic, but have a background from
>     Delphi, VB & C. 80% of my daily work is done in VB.

Just so you know, I love VB for projects that are suitable to it.

Quote:
> PPS!
>     Alexandre... YOur statement doesn't sound very serious.

I hope the two posts I just sent will clarify the statement. I was serious,
it really is the worse programming language (mostly because of it's
implementation)...

I wonder what the guys at Sun and IBM are thinking... Although I don't like
the .NET idea of Microsoft, it's so obvious it's going to eat Java for
breakfast.

Alex.



Tue, 20 Jan 2004 04:08:24 GMT  
 JAVA or .NET
Saying Java sucks because Swing is {*filter*}(which it is) and because the
current crop of IDE's (for Windows, anyway) are still not very pretty,
misses most of the point.  Java does really lousy user-interface in Windoze
for completely political reasons (at root).  And IDE's take time to mature.
Remember VB1?

I've got (I swear!) a project with a VB GUI and Java object model underneath
and it's the best of both damn worlds.  Sort of. <g>

Jim Deutch
MS Dev MVP

Quote:
> > nooo... Java is well cool... and there's tons of cash in it...
> > I develop in java , VB, C , Visual C++... and java is where
> > I make most money...

> Is it cool cause you like the language or it's cool cause it brings you
back
> alot of money?

> You make alot of cash doing Java cause there isn't much offer. There isn't
> much offer because Java is, in my opinion (and that of pretty much
everybody
> I know), an ill designed language and most of all platform.

> BTW I've done Java for 1.5 years and I've got a 7 years background in
C/C++,
> 3 years in VB, as well as many other languages. It was fun the first
couple
> weeks but when I finally understood the whole concept and realized how bad
> they implemented it, it really modified my view of it.

> Have you done interface in Java?

> Moreover, have you done Swing?

> Finally, have you actually developped code that had to be compatible with
> multiple platforms?

> Last question, what crappy IDE did you use (cause they are all crappy)?

> Without going into details, lets just say the answers to these questions
are
> enough for me to not want to touch Java again with a 10' pole... I have
> strong Java experience, and I don't mention it in my resume cause I don't
> want to get hired for a Java project.

> Alex.



Tue, 20 Jan 2004 04:50:02 GMT  
 JAVA or .NET

Quote:
> Saying Java sucks because Swing is {*filter*}(which it is) and because the
> current crop of IDE's (for Windows, anyway) are still not very pretty,
> misses most of the point.  Java does really lousy user-interface in
Windoze
> for completely political reasons (at root).  And IDE's take time to
mature.
> Remember VB1?

What about the speed which it is ridiculously lacking? What about the major
differences between different VMs on different OSes? About about the damn
windows not receiving a click if you move the mouse at the same time? There
are some flaws that are acceptable, but Java really is the king of
unnacceptable flaws...

Quote:
> I've got (I swear!) a project with a VB GUI and Java object model
underneath
> and it's the best of both damn worlds.  Sort of. <g>

VB is indeed seriously lacking in the OO department. I guess if the speed
isn't an issue, this mix wouldn't be too bad. There's still the fact you
need a VM on the user's machine, and the VM is not only slow to 'boot' but
also takes ALOT of ram...

An OS in an OS doesn't sound right to me... The crossplatform idea is great,
but again, the implementation sucks.

Alex.



Tue, 20 Jan 2004 05:01:46 GMT  
 JAVA or .NET

Quote:

> Learn java now and you'll pick up c# no problem...
> c# just a java ripoff with a better event model...

It is not a Java rip-off.  Java is essentially a simplified and
intentionally-restricted implementation of C++, and C# is a very slightly
restricted version of C++, which fits into the .NET framework with the same
underlying execution model as VB.NET.  It's convergent evolution, perhaps, but
not a rip-off.
Quote:



> > I am considering training in programming.  I am looking at long term
> > prospects. Which programming language should I learn- Java or VB (leading
> to
> > C# and .NET)?

> > I realise that this news group is visited mostly by VB/M$ enthusiasts.
> But
> > I am hoping to get an impartial and well rounded opinion/s.

> > Thanks in advance.

> > Pan



Tue, 20 Jan 2004 07:24:13 GMT  
 JAVA or .NET
wow... You are angry.!!!

java's cool for both reasons.... I thinks it a cool language
and I think it cool cos I make a lot of cash from it.....

Quote:
> Have you done interface in Java?

yep.... 2 years of CORBA based programming

Quote:
> Moreover, have you done Swing?

yep.... How many lines of code does it take to produce a
a button in a frame in Visual C++.... compared to Java...
A hell of a lot more in visual C++.... Not as many in VB
but then You gotta bulk up with the dependancy files VB
requires.... If a swing objects does not provide the functionaity
I require I write a bean component instead...

Quote:
> Finally, have you actually developped code that had to be compatible with
> multiple platforms?

yep.. just finished a project to run on both Unix and winNt2k... and it
works a treat.
The only thing your have make sure of is to stick to SUN's object model and
VM.. the applications is also generic enough to work with both Sql server
and oracle...

Quote:
> Last question, what crappy IDE did you use (cause they are all crappy)?

I generally use Visual cafe enterprise edition... The debugging is'nt the
best
but it's good enough....

You say you got 1.5 years of java experience.. In what.. I got 5 years of
heavy
duty java involved with everything from applets, servlets, client / server
apps to
web based queueing apps that use the DOM framework....

Steve (Bsc)


Quote:
> > nooo... Java is well cool... and there's tons of cash in it...
> > I develop in java , VB, C , Visual C++... and java is where
> > I make most money...

> Is it cool cause you like the language or it's cool cause it brings you
back
> alot of money?

> You make alot of cash doing Java cause there isn't much offer. There isn't
> much offer because Java is, in my opinion (and that of pretty much
everybody
> I know), an ill designed language and most of all platform.

> BTW I've done Java for 1.5 years and I've got a 7 years background in
C/C++,
> 3 years in VB, as well as many other languages. It was fun the first
couple
> weeks but when I finally understood the whole concept and realized how bad
> they implemented it, it really modified my view of it.

> Have you done interface in Java?

> Moreover, have you done Swing?

> Finally, have you actually developped code that had to be compatible with
> multiple platforms?

> Last question, what crappy IDE did you use (cause they are all crappy)?

> Without going into details, lets just say the answers to these questions
are
> enough for me to not want to touch Java again with a 10' pole... I have
> strong Java experience, and I don't mention it in my resume cause I don't
> want to get hired for a Java project.

> Alex.



Wed, 21 Jan 2004 02:09:56 GMT  
 JAVA or .NET

Quote:

> After that, VB, BV.net, C# etc. will be a snap, should you
> need it.

It's worth bearing in mind that .NET is OK as an intranet solution or
server-side only, but the interface options will not apply to all browsers
soon, if ever, and Java is at least widely (supposedly everywhere) supported.
The target platform must be borne in mind.


Tue, 20 Jan 2004 07:28:37 GMT  
 JAVA or .NET


Quote:
> An OS in an OS doesn't sound right to me... The crossplatform idea is
great,
> but again, the implementation sucks.

But that is exactly what all the .NET languages are (including VB.NET).  I
tend to agree with you, but there is no escaping the fact that VB is headed
the exact same place Java has already been for years...

FWIW,
Ray



Fri, 23 Jan 2004 23:19:53 GMT  
 
 [ 12 post ] 

 Relevant Pages 

1. difference between Java and .NET

2. FUTURE : Java or .NET

3. Java vs .NET

4. Allchin contrasts Java and .NET

5. JAVA or .NET

6. JAVA or .NET

7. Performance Test: VB.NET, C#, Java, ...

8. VB.net vs. java desktop Application

9. call java web service by visual basic.net

10. Java Bean as COM object in VB.NET

11. Java Bean through COM in .NET?

12. Java & .NET interop

 

 
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software