Webbrowser Control without IE
Author |
Message |
Houston McClun #1 / 9
|
 Webbrowser Control without IE
Hi all, Please forgive me for the cross-post. I'm working on a web-browser program, which uses the IE WebBrowser control. It may be used by person's who do not have IE installed on their systems. All the registry entries - as far as I know - have been provided for by my program, as well as a fav's folder and history cache. What else, if anything, needs to be accounted for for the control to work properly on a comp without IE. (except for regsvr32 and all that), or will it work properly. I don't want the users of the program to have to install IE before installing this program ... that would be ridiculous. So, do I have any chance of this working? And would anyone (without Internet Explorer) be willing to do a beta-test? Thanks In Advance, Houston McClung III
|
Fri, 19 Sep 2003 01:14:01 GMT |
|
 |
Douglas Marquard #2 / 9
|
 Webbrowser Control without IE
Hi Houston: Quote: > I'm working on a web-browser program, which uses the IE WebBrowser control. > It may be used by person's who do not have IE installed on their systems
AFIK, that is against licencing -- IE must be installed on the machine for you to use the control. Doug.
|
Fri, 19 Sep 2003 02:01:22 GMT |
|
 |
Mike #3 / 9
|
 Webbrowser Control without IE
Internet Explorer MUST be installed to use the WebBrowser control. There are simply no ifs, ands, or buts about it. How can you expect to use IE functionality if IE is not installed? If users will not have IE already installed, you'll need to get a license from Microsoft to distribute IE with your program, or you can instruct your users to download IE directly from MS prior to installing/using your program. Those are your ONLY 2 choices if you want to use the WebBrowser control. Even the WebBrowser control itself (shdocvw.dll, a file that is a core component of IE) is NOT redistributable. On a personal note, it's not ridiculous. Consider how tightly IE is tied to Windows and the problems there would be if MS did not control distribution of IE and its components as they do. It would be a nightmare. Mike
Quote: > Hi all, > Please forgive me for the cross-post. > I'm working on a web-browser program, which uses the IE WebBrowser control. > It may be used by person's who do not have IE installed on their systems. > All the registry entries - as far as I know - have been provided for by my > program, as well as a fav's folder and history cache. > What else, if anything, needs to be accounted for for the control to work > properly on a comp without IE. (except for regsvr32 and all that), or will > it work properly. I don't want the users of the program to have to install > IE before installing this program ... that would be ridiculous. > So, do I have any chance of this working? And would anyone (without > Internet Explorer) be willing to do a beta-test? > Thanks In Advance, > Houston McClung III
|
Fri, 19 Sep 2003 02:30:34 GMT |
|
 |
Kevin Williams #4 / 9
|
 Webbrowser Control without IE
As the other two have stated, you cannot use IE functionality without IE being installed. And if your users (or you) think that using all of the functionality of IE without having to install IE is ridiculous, maybe they (you) need to rethink what they are doing. Do your users have any web browser (Netscape) installed? If so, you can just use the ShellExecute API per KB article Q224816. So, knowing that your users have to have IE installed (if for nothing other than licensing issues) keep in mind that you also cannot just download the installation package for IE from the MS website and include it on your CD. That also is against licensing agreements. But you can obtain the IEAK (Internet Explorer Administration Kit) that will allow you to create a custom IE installation package for your users. Go to http://www.microsoft.com/windows/ieak/en/default.asp for information about the IEAK. Kevin --------------------
| Newsgroups: microsoft.public.inetsdk.programming.webbrowser_ctl,microsoft.public.vb.cont rols,microsoft.public.vb.controls.internet | Subject: Webbrowser Control without IE | Lines: 21 | Organization: McC Online | X-Priority: 3 | X-MSMail-Priority: Normal | X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 | X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
| Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2001 17:14:01 GMT | NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.19.114.83
| X-Trace: news1.rdc2.pa.home.com 986145241 24.19.114.83 (Sun, 01 Apr 2001 10:14:01 PDT) | NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2001 10:14:01 PDT | Path: cppssbbsa01.microsoft.com!news-out.cwix.com!newsfeed.cwix.com!cpk-news-hub1. bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!newshub2.home.com!news.home.com!news1.rdc2.pa.ho me.com.POSTED!not-for-mail | Xref: cppssbbsa01.microsoft.com microsoft.public.inetsdk.programming.webbrowser_ctl:10446 microsoft.public.vb.controls:108375 microsoft.public.vb.controls.internet:30901 | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.vb.controls | | Hi all, | | Please forgive me for the cross-post. | | I'm working on a web-browser program, which uses the IE WebBrowser control. | It may be used by person's who do not have IE installed on their systems. | All the registry entries - as far as I know - have been provided for by my | program, as well as a fav's folder and history cache. | | What else, if anything, needs to be accounted for for the control to work | properly on a comp without IE. (except for regsvr32 and all that), or will | it work properly. I don't want the users of the program to have to install | IE before installing this program ... that would be ridiculous. | | So, do I have any chance of this working? And would anyone (without | Internet Explorer) be willing to do a beta-test? | | Thanks In Advance, | Houston McClung III | | |
|
Sat, 20 Sep 2003 02:33:06 GMT |
|
 |
Mark Meyer #5 / 9
|
 Webbrowser Control without IE
Isn't IE always installed? I thought you could only de-install the icon on the desktop.
Quote: > Hi Houston: > > I'm working on a web-browser program, which uses the IE WebBrowser > control. > > It may be used by person's who do not have IE installed on their systems > AFIK, that is against licencing -- IE must be installed on the machine for > you to use the control. > Doug.
|
Sat, 20 Sep 2003 05:55:52 GMT |
|
 |
Igor Tandetni #6 / 9
|
 Webbrowser Control without IE
Good old Win95 doesn't have it installed by default, or it is optional, don't remember which. -- With best wishes, Igor Tandetnik
Quote: > Isn't IE always installed? I thought you could only de-install the icon on > the desktop.
> > Hi Houston: > > > I'm working on a web-browser program, which uses the IE WebBrowser > > control. > > > It may be used by person's who do not have IE installed on their systems > > AFIK, that is against licencing -- IE must be installed on the machine for > > you to use the control. > > Doug.
|
Sat, 20 Sep 2003 06:10:16 GMT |
|
 |
Mark Meyer #7 / 9
|
 Webbrowser Control without IE
That was a really good operating system.
Quote: > Good old Win95 doesn't have it installed by default, or it is optional, > don't remember which. > -- > With best wishes, > Igor Tandetnik
> > Isn't IE always installed? I thought you could only de-install the icon > on > > the desktop.
> > > Hi Houston: > > > > I'm working on a web-browser program, which uses the IE WebBrowser > > > control. > > > > It may be used by person's who do not have IE installed on their > systems > > > AFIK, that is against licencing -- IE must be installed on the machine > for > > > you to use the control. > > > Doug.
|
Sat, 20 Sep 2003 07:11:04 GMT |
|
 |
Houston McClun #8 / 9
|
 Webbrowser Control without IE
Thanks guys. I really appreciate the advice. I didn't know there could be a licensing issue. Let me ask one more thing about it ... on a similiar note, are there any licensing issues involved with distributing a component with the executable, like if the setup wizard adds mscomctl32.ocx or something like that to the setup.exe, or to a setup.zip (if for whatever reason I'd need to do it), file?
Quote: > Hi all, > Please forgive me for the cross-post. > I'm working on a web-browser program, which uses the IE WebBrowser control. > It may be used by person's who do not have IE installed on their systems. > All the registry entries - as far as I know - have been provided for by my > program, as well as a fav's folder and history cache. > What else, if anything, needs to be accounted for for the control to work > properly on a comp without IE. (except for regsvr32 and all that), or will > it work properly. I don't want the users of the program to have to install > IE before installing this program ... that would be ridiculous. > So, do I have any chance of this working? And would anyone (without > Internet Explorer) be willing to do a beta-test? > Thanks In Advance, > Houston McClung III
|
Sat, 20 Sep 2003 11:23:39 GMT |
|
 |
Kevin Williams #9 / 9
|
 Webbrowser Control without IE
The Package and Deployment Wizard will check the redist.txt file. If it adds a component to a package you are generally ok to distribute it. Alternatively you could check the redist.txt file yourself for files you can distribute. Kevin --------------------
| Newsgroups: microsoft.public.inetsdk.programming.webbrowser_ctl,microsoft.public.vb.cont rols,microsoft.public.vb.controls.internet
| Subject: Re: Webbrowser Control without IE | Lines: 34 | Organization: McC Online | X-Priority: 3 | X-MSMail-Priority: Normal | X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 | X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
| Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2001 03:23:39 GMT | NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.19.114.83
| X-Trace: news1.rdc2.pa.home.com 986268219 24.19.114.83 (Mon, 02 Apr 2001 20:23:39 PDT) | NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 20:23:39 PDT | Path: cppssbbsa01.microsoft.com!tkmsftngp01!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de !news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newshub2.home.com!news.home com!news1.rdc2.pa.home.com.POSTED!not-for-mail | Xref: cppssbbsa01.microsoft.com microsoft.public.inetsdk.programming.webbrowser_ctl:10461 microsoft.public.vb.controls:108464 microsoft.public.vb.controls.internet:30929 | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.vb.controls | | Thanks guys. I really appreciate the advice. I didn't know there could be | a licensing issue. Let me ask one more thing about it ... on a similiar | note, are there any licensing issues involved with distributing a component | with the executable, like if the setup wizard adds mscomctl32.ocx or | something like that to the setup.exe, or to a setup.zip (if for whatever | reason I'd need to do it), file? |
| > Hi all, | > | > Please forgive me for the cross-post. | > | > I'm working on a web-browser program, which uses the IE WebBrowser | control. | > It may be used by person's who do not have IE installed on their systems. | > All the registry entries - as far as I know - have been provided for by my | > program, as well as a fav's folder and history cache. | > | > What else, if anything, needs to be accounted for for the control to work | > properly on a comp without IE. (except for regsvr32 and all that), or will | > it work properly. I don't want the users of the program to have to | install | > IE before installing this program ... that would be ridiculous. | > | > So, do I have any chance of this working? And would anyone (without | > Internet Explorer) be willing to do a beta-test? | > | > Thanks In Advance, | > Houston McClung III | > | > | | |
|
Sat, 20 Sep 2003 22:26:06 GMT |
|
|
|