Latest WSH engine compatible with NT Option Pack 4.0 ? 
Author Message
 Latest WSH engine compatible with NT Option Pack 4.0 ?

Needed to upgrade to latest available WSH.  Then had to switch back
to Interdev, and do some web page work, but local hosting was broke
- no sure what did that.  MS said to reinstall Option Pack, which I
did, and I managed to get my web work out.  Now I find my WSF files
no longer execute.  I take this to mean that IIS installation trounced
my upgraded script engine.  Does anyone know if I now reinstall
latest WSH will I again break IIS ?

--
______________________________________________________________________
Lee Gillie, CCP                                Remove NOSPAM to E-Mail
Online Data Processing, Inc. - 3501 N. Haven -  Spokane, WA 99207-8500



Mon, 16 Sep 2002 03:00:00 GMT  
 Latest WSH engine compatible with NT Option Pack 4.0 ?
It's unlikely the a WSH install will (or ever did) break IIS.  I've installed WSH 2.0 on several
boxes running IIS (PWS anyway) with zero problems...

--
Michael Harris
MVP Scripting

Needed to upgrade to latest available WSH.  Then had to switch back
to Interdev, and do some web page work, but local hosting was broke
- no sure what did that.  MS said to reinstall Option Pack, which I
did, and I managed to get my web work out.  Now I find my WSF files
no longer execute.  I take this to mean that IIS installation trounced
my upgraded script engine.  Does anyone know if I now reinstall
latest WSH will I again break IIS ?

--
______________________________________________________________________
Lee Gillie, CCP                                Remove NOSPAM to E-Mail
Online Data Processing, Inc. - 3501 N. Haven -  Spokane, WA 99207-8500



Mon, 16 Sep 2002 03:00:00 GMT  
 Latest WSH engine compatible with NT Option Pack 4.0 ?
You should always install ste51en (or IE5) on an IIS4 server (Option Pack)
to get the latest scripting engines.
I do this on all client sites to fix bugs (memory leaks) and improve
performance.
Only trap is that there are some new reserved words in VBScript that can
cause errors in older ASP applications but it is not very likely to happen
(only once for me).

Regards,
Ian
Senior Consultant     | MSDN Regional Director
ADV E-Commerce    | Windows Script FAQ
Advantage Group    | http://www.windows-script.com

Quote:
> It's unlikely the a WSH install will (or ever did) break IIS.  I've

installed WSH 2.0 on several
Quote:
> boxes running IIS (PWS anyway) with zero problems...

> --
> Michael Harris
> MVP Scripting




Quote:
> Needed to upgrade to latest available WSH.  Then had to switch back
> to Interdev, and do some web page work, but local hosting was broke
> - no sure what did that.  MS said to reinstall Option Pack, which I
> did, and I managed to get my web work out.  Now I find my WSF files
> no longer execute.  I take this to mean that IIS installation trounced
> my upgraded script engine.  Does anyone know if I now reinstall
> latest WSH will I again break IIS ?

> --
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Lee Gillie, CCP                                Remove NOSPAM to E-Mail
> Online Data Processing, Inc. - 3501 N. Haven -  Spokane, WA 99207-8500



Tue, 17 Sep 2002 03:00:00 GMT  
 
 [ 3 post ] 

 Relevant Pages 

1. WSH on NT 4.0 Server without IE 4.0 (5.0)

2. Q: NT 4.0 Printers Options

3. NT 4.0 does not understand WSH

4. Security Concerns for implementing WSH in a Windows NT 4.0 environment

5. Running WSH on NT 4.0

6. NT 4.0 Event Log management from WSH

7. WSH works with NT 4.0

8. WSH is not working under NT 4.0

9. Enabling Remote Access for WSH on Windows NT 4.0 SP6

10. WSH 5.6 on NT 4.0 SP4 - GetObject trouble

11. Security Concerns for implementing WSH in a Windows NT 4.0 environment

12. IE 3.02 & 4.0 PP2 compatible problem

 

 
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software