NEWS: MS published .NET Roadmap 2002-2004 
Author Message
 NEWS: MS published .NET Roadmap 2002-2004

Microsoft Developer Tools Roadmap 2002-2004:
  http://www.*-*-*.com/

PR:
  http://www.*-*-*.com/

--
  NETMaster  (Thomas Scheidegger)
  http://www.*-*-*.com/



Fri, 11 Feb 2005 21:16:24 GMT  
 NEWS: MS published .NET Roadmap 2002-2004
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002 15:16:24 +0200, "NETMaster"

Quote:

>Microsoft Developer Tools Roadmap 2002-2004:
>  http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/productinfo/roadmap.asp

Interesting... far from dropping J# .NET, Microsoft will instead
incorporate it into Visual Studio "Everett," the next release that
will use .NET 1.1 and run on .NET Server.  They also promise
ever-increasing standards conformance for Visual C++ .NET but only
"above 95%", not full conformance.  No surprise there.  And as far as
I could there aren't any dates, other than the 2002-2004 timeframe.


Fri, 11 Feb 2005 23:12:47 GMT  
 NEWS: MS published .NET Roadmap 2002-2004
  > there aren't any dates, other than the 2002-2004 timeframe.

The dates will be synchronized with important Microsoft !PLATFORM! milestones.

According to
  http://www.infoworld.com/articles/hn/xml/02/08/22/020822hnvizstudio.xml
Everett: 2003 Q1  (Windows .NET Server)
Yukon:   2004     (Yukon SQL Server)

--
  NETMaster  (Thomas Scheidegger)
  http://www.cetus-links.org/oo_CSharp.html



Fri, 11 Feb 2005 23:36:03 GMT  
 NEWS: MS published .NET Roadmap 2002-2004


Quote:
> On Mon, 26 Aug 2002 15:16:24 +0200, "NETMaster"

>>Microsoft Developer Tools Roadmap 2002-2004:
>>  http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/productinfo/roadmap.asp

> Interesting... far from dropping J# .NET, Microsoft will instead
> incorporate it into Visual Studio "Everett," the next release that
> will use .NET 1.1 and run on .NET Server.  They also promise
> ever-increasing standards conformance for Visual C++ .NET but only
> "above 95%", not full conformance.  No surprise there.  

        I might suprise you, but the people who do understand the full
        100% of the C++ standard are far in the minority compared to the
        total group of C++ developers. With generics being added to
        the .NET platform, templates can be re-added, but I'm sure
        rare used syntax will be left out, as it is too in a lot of
        other C++ compilers.

        FB

--
=======  You can't sell what's free  ====================================

Get my free, open source .NET software at   :  http://www.sd.nl/software
=========================================================================



Sat, 12 Feb 2005 03:57:18 GMT  
 
 [ 4 post ] 

 Relevant Pages 

1. VB.NET or VB with Access 2004

2. MS Access 2002 vs VB.net as a front-end to SQL Server data

3. MS Report - Things of interest to VB .NET Developers - November 23, 2002

4. spped problems with MS Access 2002 as client, Word 2002 as server

5. Can I publish XML Automatically from Access 2002?

6. MS Ed & Cert Roadmap - Downloading

7. Path: news.minn.net!news-out.visi.com!visi.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!worldnet.att.net!feed1.news

8. Office vis a vis .NET 2002 and .NET 2003

9. VS.NET 2003 project back to VS.NET 2002

10. Upgrading to VS.Net 2003 from VS.Net 2002

11. vb.net 2002 or vb.net 2003 beta

12. VS .NET 2002 upgrade to 2003 and CR.NET

 

 
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software