I have been using RC1 of VS.NET for about 2-3 weeks now. (have been using notepad before that). I have experienced that the IntelliSense is much more helpful and extensive in VB.NET than in C#.NET. Is this going to change in the final Release product.
One the same note, if someone from MS can stopping killing us anymore and tell us when can we download RTM from the MSDN Subscribers downloads.
Thanks Manuj
Wed, 16 Jun 2004 06:41:45 GMT
Eric Richard #2 / 4
IntelliSense in VS.NET (C# versus VB.NET)
Try visual assist at http://www.visualassist.com . They have a .net version of their tool
Quote:
> Hi
> I have been using RC1 of VS.NET for about 2-3 weeks now. (have been using > notepad before that). > I have experienced that the IntelliSense is much more helpful and extensive > in VB.NET than in C#.NET. > Is this going to change in the final Release product.
> One the same note, if someone from MS can stopping killing us anymore and > tell us when can we download RTM from the MSDN Subscribers downloads.
> Thanks > Manuj
Wed, 16 Jun 2004 09:34:25 GMT
Alfred C Thompson I #3 / 4
IntelliSense in VS.NET (C# versus VB.NET)
Quote:
> I have experienced that the IntelliSense is much more helpful and extensive > in VB.NET than in C#.NET. > Is this going to change in the final Release product.
Probably not. VB does more checking at design time then C# and that is not likely to change.
Wed, 16 Jun 2004 09:34:42 GMT
Kathleen Dollar #4 / 4
IntelliSense in VS.NET (C# versus VB.NET)
Manuj,
Part of the difference in behavior is that only VB.NET has a background compiler. Three cheers for immediate blue squiggly underlines for compiler errors! This and better Intellisense will not change in RTM.
IntelliSense in VS.NET (C# versus VB.NET)