VB.Net, .NET Framework 1.1 and Visual Studio 2002

.NET Framework 1.1 and Visual Studio 2002

Author	Message
Alai #1 / 9	.NET Framework 1.1 and Visual Studio 2002 How to use .NET Framework 1.1. and VS 2002? I uninstalled .NET Framework 1.0 and VS 2002 didn't work anymore. Am I required to buy/install VS 2003??? Also, which current versions of Windows would already support an application I would compile in VB.NET / .NET Framework 1.0 platform if I would only supply the .exe to the users? Many thanks, Al
Thu, 06 Oct 2005 07:56:38 GMT

Paul Wilson [MVP #2 / 9	.NET Framework 1.1 and Visual Studio 2002 VS 2002 requires .NET 1.0 and only targets .NET 1.0. VS 2003 requires .NET 1.1 and only targets .NET 1.1. This is not to say that something targeted towards .NET 1.0 will not run on .NET 1.1 if its the only one present on system or if the application is configured appropriately to try anyhow. Likewise something targeted to .NET 1.1 may possibly run on .NET 1.0 if its configured to try to do so, but it may fail. But the VS products themselves are tied to the framework. Windows 2003 Server comes with .NET 1.1. Its the first. Thanks, Paul Wilson (MVP)
Thu, 06 Oct 2005 09:01:38 GMT

Ken Tucke #3 / 9	.NET Framework 1.1 and Visual Studio 2002 Alian, You need the .Net framework version 1.0 to use visual studio 2002. You can add references to the .Net framework 1.1 classes. You VS 2003 to develop with the .Net framework 1.1. Ken ------ Quote: > How to use .NET Framework 1.1. and VS 2002? I uninstalled .NET Framework 1.0 > and VS 2002 didn't work anymore. Am I required to buy/install VS 2003??? > Also, which current versions of Windows would already support an application > I would compile in VB.NET / .NET Framework 1.0 platform if I would only > supply the .exe to the users? > Many thanks, Al
Thu, 06 Oct 2005 09:02:58 GMT

Herfried K. Wagne #4 / 9	.NET Framework 1.1 and Visual Studio 2002 Hello, Quote: > How to use .NET Framework 1.1. and VS 2002? I > uninstalled .NET Framework 1.0 and VS 2002 didn't work > anymore. Am I required to buy/install VS 2003??? VS .NET 2002 can create .NET 1.0 applications only. You can use the Fx 1.1 classes, but your apps will still be .NET 1.0 applications, even if Fx 1.1 is installed on the development machine. ~29$ + shipping + ... http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/howtobuy/everett/ http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/specialoffer/ Quote: > Also, which current versions of Windows would already support > an application I would compile in VB.NET / .NET Framework > 1.0 platform if I would only supply the .exe to the users? See: http://msdn.microsoft.com/netframework/productinfo/versioncomparison/... .asp Regards, Herfried K. Wagner
Thu, 06 Oct 2005 09:27:38 GMT

Corrado Cavalli [MVP #5 / 9	.NET Framework 1.1 and Visual Studio 2002 VS2003 by default targets 1.1 but can, optionally, target also 1.0 or both. Changing target creates a .config file that must be deployed to clicnet machine in order to target different CLR version So you can use VS2003 to create application running on 1.0 version of CLR, of course compatibility vs 1.0 must be checked by you. HTH -- Corrado Cavalli [Microsoft .NET MVP] UGIdotNET - http://www.ugidotnet.org
Thu, 06 Oct 2005 15:58:32 GMT

Chris Dunawa #6 / 9	.NET Framework 1.1 and Visual Studio 2002 Quote: > VS 2002 requires .NET 1.0 and only targets .NET 1.0. > VS 2003 requires .NET 1.1 and only targets .NET 1.1. And what happens when .Net 1.2 comes out? Will we be required to purchase yet another version of VS.Net? And will that version only have a minimal cost too? It seems to me that Microsoft should be able to create VS.Net to target any version of the framework without forcing us to continually upgrade. Chris -- If you don't like lunchmeat, please remove it from my e-mail address to send me an e-mail
Fri, 07 Oct 2005 22:10:53 GMT

Dino Chiesa [MSFT #7 / 9	.NET Framework 1.1 and Visual Studio 2002 We need a FAQ. Quote: > Hello, > > How to use .NET Framework 1.1. and VS 2002? I > > uninstalled .NET Framework 1.0 and VS 2002 didn't work > > anymore. Am I required to buy/install VS 2003??? > VS .NET 2002 can create .NET 1.0 applications only. You can use the Fx 1.1 > classes, but your apps will still be .NET 1.0 applications, even if Fx 1.1 > is installed on the development machine. > ~29$ + shipping + ... > http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/howtobuy/everett/ > http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/specialoffer/ > > Also, which current versions of Windows would already support > > an application I would compile in VB.NET / .NET Framework > > 1.0 platform if I would only supply the .exe to the users? > See: http://msdn.microsoft.com/netframework/productinfo/versioncomparison/... - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Quote: > .asp > Regards, > Herfried K. Wagner
Fri, 07 Oct 2005 22:15:36 GMT

MVP #8 / 9	.NET Framework 1.1 and Visual Studio 2002 Definitely! To a newcomer, this really looks like "version hell" but it really is about having all the information readily available in one location from the source :-) - Mitch Quote: > We need a FAQ. > > Hello, > > > How to use .NET Framework 1.1. and VS 2002? I > > > uninstalled .NET Framework 1.0 and VS 2002 didn't work > > > anymore. Am I required to buy/install VS 2003??? > > VS .NET 2002 can create .NET 1.0 applications only. You can use the Fx 1.1 > > classes, but your apps will still be .NET 1.0 applications, even if Fx 1.1 > > is installed on the development machine. > > ~29$ + shipping + ... > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/howtobuy/everett/ > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/specialoffer/ > > > Also, which current versions of Windows would already support > > > an application I would compile in VB.NET / .NET Framework > > > 1.0 platform if I would only supply the .exe to the users? > > See: > http://msdn.microsoft.com/netframework/productinfo/versioncomparison/... > > .asp > > Regards, > > Herfried K. Wagner
Fri, 07 Oct 2005 22:55:59 GMT

Gregory A. Beame #9 / 9	.NET Framework 1.1 and Visual Studio 2002 You can use 1.1 with VS.NET 2002, but you have to pull a couple of hacks. The norm is to leave 1.0 on until you upgrade to VS.NET 2003, as they run side by side. The upgrade cost of VS.NET 2003 is $29, so it is not a major bullet to bite, and is worth it for the extras (at least for most people). -- Gregory A. Beamer MVP; MCP: +I, SE, SD, DBA Author: ADO.NET and XML: ASP.NET on the Edge ************************************************************************** Think Outside the Box! ************************************************************************ ** Quote: > How to use .NET Framework 1.1. and VS 2002? I uninstalled .NET Framework 1.0 > and VS 2002 didn't work anymore. Am I required to buy/install VS 2003??? > Also, which current versions of Windows would already support an application > I would compile in VB.NET / .NET Framework 1.0 platform if I would only > supply the .exe to the users? > Many thanks, Al
Fri, 07 Oct 2005 23:09:45 GMT

Page 1 of 1

[ 9 post ]