VB.Net, Visual Studio 2003

Clint Batma
#1 / 8

Visual Studio 2003

I recently downloaded Visual Studio 2003 and started
checking out the new features. To my suprise the
de{*filter*} didn't allow code change and continue
functionallity that I have been spoiled with in VB6.

Is there any plans to add this functionallity in the
future? It sure makes development faster and eaiser.

Thanks

Clint

Thu, 29 Sep 2005 09:59:08 GMT

Dejan Gojsevi
#2 / 8

Visual Studio 2003

It will be available in VS.NET 2.0.

Thu, 29 Sep 2005 13:51:05 GMT

John
#3 / 8

Visual Studio 2003

When will vs.net be?

Regards

Quote:

> It will be available in VS.NET 2.0.

Thu, 29 Sep 2005 18:18:30 GMT

Herfried K. Wagne
#4 / 8

Visual Studio 2003

Hello Clint,

Quote:

> checking out the new features. To my suprise the
> de{*filter*} didn't allow code change and continue
> functionallity that I have been spoiled with in VB6.

> Is there any plans to add this functionallity in the
> future? It sure makes development faster and eaiser.

Edit and Continue is planned for the Whidbey/Yukon release of VB.NET, which
comes after VS.NET 2003:

http://www.*-*-*.com/

Regards,
Herfried K. Wagner

Thu, 29 Sep 2005 19:36:31 GMT

Alex Clar
#5 / 8

Visual Studio 2003

Hi,
MS won't give a fixed release date for any of their products until about a
day before they're due to be released, but you're looking at mid-late 2004.
They had originally promised it would be in VS2003, as it was "on the top of
their list", but it somehow slipped through the net :-( I agree that it's
an extremely useful aspect of debugging, and it's a shame we're going to
have to wait so long.

Would be nice if someone at MS would realise this and maybe get Edit &
Continue ready for us a bit sooner, maybe as a downloadable addon to VS2003
?

-Alex Clark

Quote:

> I recently downloaded Visual Studio 2003 and started
> checking out the new features. To my suprise the
> de{*filter*} didn't allow code change and continue
> functionallity that I have been spoiled with in VB6.

> Is there any plans to add this functionallity in the
> future? It sure makes development faster and eaiser.

> Thanks

> Clint

Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:58:33 GMT

Hemang Sha
#6 / 8

Visual Studio 2003

Is Visual Studio 2003 different from Visual Studio.net ?

Quote:

>-----Original Message-----
>I recently downloaded Visual Studio 2003 and started
>checking out the new features. To my suprise the
>de{*filter*} didn't allow code change and continue
>functionallity that I have been spoiled with in VB6.

>Is there any plans to add this functionallity in the
>future? It sure makes development faster and eaiser.

>Thanks

>Clint
>.

Fri, 30 Sep 2005 00:48:26 GMT

Tom Spin
#7 / 8

Visual Studio 2003

Now that's an interesting question, that will probably create a very large
thread.

IMHO, they are the same, I think it's just the way people call the product
and the acutal version of the product, i.e. visual studio .net 2002 and
visual studio .net 2003 are just different versions of visual studio .net.

--
==============================================
Happy to Help,
Tom Spink

http://www.*-*-*.com/ > .NET code (soon)

One Day,

Quote:

> Is Visual Studio 2003 different from Visual Studio.net ?

> >-----Original Message-----
> >I recently downloaded Visual Studio 2003 and started
> >checking out the new features. To my suprise the
> >de{*filter*} didn't allow code change and continue
> >functionallity that I have been spoiled with in VB6.

> >Is there any plans to add this functionallity in the
> >future? It sure makes development faster and eaiser.

> >Thanks

> >Clint
> >.

Fri, 30 Sep 2005 06:20:18 GMT

Stewa
#8 / 8

Visual Studio 2003

Hopefully VS.Net 2.0 will be backwardly compatible. Just imagine your
average developers hard drive with VS6, VS.Net, VS.Net 2003 and VS.New
2.0. How many gig would that be? Perhaps a better solution for MS
would be to at lease keep the IDE and MSDN backwardly compatible so
that all that is needed is multiple frameworks.

Quote:

> It will be available in VS.NET 2.0.

Fri, 30 Sep 2005 15:36:57 GMT