natural language vs. computer language 
Author Message
 natural language vs. computer language

You should try LISP-like languages : if you want to add an "unless" fom and
whatever form you like, you just can do it...
But the basic Lisp (or Scheme) has very few special forms, so that it can be
easily interpreted or compiled.
The trouble with rich languages as Perl is that the compiler has to know all
those synonyms and it get more complex for only little benefit.
And somebody who learns it might be confused with all those different


Tue, 02 Oct 2001 03:00:00 GMT  
 [ 1 post ] 

 Relevant Pages 

1. natural language vs. computer language

2. Natural selection of languages (was: JAVA papers [re: oak] [re: features for systems programming languages]) [LONG]

3. Perl - is it like a natural language ?

4. Natural Language Processing

5. Article against perl's natural language principles

6. Parsing Natural Language

7. Perl for natural language processing?

8. New updates needed for an old computer language humor piece

9. perl is a microcosm of computer language theory

10. Searchable Database of Computer Language Software

11. psychology of language choice (was Re: language war ...)

12. fast prototyping vs scripting languages


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software