Quote:
>On Jan 18, 1996 15:35:15 in article <Copyright Question>, '"Armando A.
>>Hi everyone,
>>I have a Visual Basic application I would like to copyright. I checked
>>the copyright home page in the net and found that I need to send them an
>>application form plus $20. My problem is that I don't know witch form to
>>complete (Form TX, Form PA, etc). There are several forms available for
>>different purposes, but software is not mention at all. I would
>>appreciate if somebody can tell me witch form to use to copyright
>>software.
>>TIA
>>Armando
I find the replies in this thread very interesting, as many have mentioned
sending a physical copy of the source code to make the copyright ironclad.
Honest question: Does anybody out there really believe that Microsloth has
registered the source code for Windows 95 in this manner? That Adobe
has published the source for their software by shipping it off for
registration? Same for Apple, IBM, etc. You get the point.
In light of Apple losing their lawsuit against Microsloth for the 'ripoff'
of the Mac operating system (don't mean to start a flame war with this one),
it seems that the best way to go is placing a copyright notice on your
software, putting it on the market FIRST, and then accepting the fact
that if it's good, there will be imitators (ripoffs?)
We all know you can't copyright ideas such as toolbars, pop-up menus, etc.
You can't hold exclusive rights to a Visual Basic program that, say, maintains
a payroll ledger -- anybody can write such a program. Whether they stole
your ideas exactly in producing their version is a matter that you *can*
argue in the courts, but all the previous cases seem to have been decided
against the original copyright holder.
Now, having said that: anybody out there *really* want to help their
competitors out by shipping all their juicy source code off to some
government agency where anybody could potentially view it?
----
Funny story: I just had this discussion with attorneys here in Kentucky
(USA) who have never copyrighted S/W before, but are trying to treat it
like an artistic creation (not a bad idea). When I refused to send source
code, they asked for 'the binaries'. I sent them a floppy disk with an
executable.
Two days later, they called back and said that I needed to PRINT THE
EXECUTABLE.
Yep, they wanted me to print the executable. I haven't stopped laughing
yet, and I am more scared than ever of 'legal experts' who don't understand
the subject matter.
[stepping off soapbox now]
Mark Alsip