why both msajt112.dll and msajt200.dll needed? 
Author Message
 why both msajt112.dll and msajt200.dll needed?

I'm using VB3.0 and Access 2.0 and have the compatability
layer in action. I recently set about to package up my
application. It turns out that I need both msajt112.dll and
msajt200.dll. It seems like the later would subsume the former.
Am I doing something wrong, or do I really need both?

Thanks.



Tue, 09 Dec 1997 03:00:00 GMT  
 why both msajt112.dll and msajt200.dll needed?

Quote:
>I'm using VB3.0 and Access 2.0 and have the compatability
>layer in action. I recently set about to package up my
>application. It turns out that I need both msajt112.dll and
>msajt200.dll. It seems like the later would subsume the former.
>Am I doing something wrong, or do I really need both?

msajt112.dll *IS* the compatability layer.  You do need both...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dr Hugh Leslie                    Melbourne, Australia.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



Sat, 13 Dec 1997 03:00:00 GMT  
 
 [ 2 post ] 

 Relevant Pages 

1. Problem with MSAJT110.DLL vs. MSAJT112.DLL

2. Problem with MSAJT110.DLL vs. MSAJT112.DLL

3. GPF in MSAJT200.DLL / DAO2516.DLL

4. msajt200.dll & dao2516.dll

5. MSAJT112.DLL help required please

6. Error message cannot load MSAJT112.DLL

7. Distributing msajt112.dll

8. MSAJT112.DLL not found error

9. VB Cannot Find MSAJT112.DLL ??

10. DLL DLL DLL DLL DLL DLL

11. MSAJT200.DLL Anyone know the latest release

12. GPF in MSAJT200.DLL (Jet 2.5)

 

 
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software