
Visual Basic - is it good enough to write GUI packages on Pentium and Alpha?
Quote:
>Hi,
>We have been developing GUI-based products on SPARC(running Solaris) and
>Pentium (running Windows3) using Visix's Galaxy product to develop portable
>GUI code. Now we are looking to develop a product which runs on Pentium
>under NT and Dec Alpha under NT. Now Galaxy is very
>expensive. Is Visual Basic good enough for developing GUIs for Pentium and
>Dec Alphas which control application and driver code written in C? Does it
>produce solid enough applications, run fast enough, port easily to Alpha,
>etc?
>I would be delighted to be advised by you all, as I know virtually nothing
>about Visual Basic (apart from what I read in a bookstore)
VB4 is a wonderful way to front end code written in C/C++. I often
find myself writing C++ code as an invisible OCX and then use VB to
design the user-interface because it's so much simpler in VB.
Currently VB4 comes in two flavours - 16 and 32 bit. Today you can run
the 16-bit variety on the Pentium and Alpha because of the 286
emulator built into the RISC version of Windows NT. VB4 was quite
recently released and one of the major differences between it and
prior versions is that it is now written in C, rather than assembler
so one can only hope for a native Alpha version.
In the meantime, check out this month's Byte magazine - it has an
article about the FX!32 Win32 emulator that DEC is working on. This
will allow you to run x86 Win32 binaries on an Alpha without
recompilation at around 70% of native performance.
Go shell out the 100 quid for the Standard Edition - I don't know
about the UK but in the US, Microsoft offers a 30 day money back
guarantee, so if you don't like it take it back and if you do like it,
take it back and get the Professional Edition.
Regards,
Rod