Visual Basic, Oracle vs SQL Server

Oracle vs SQL Server

Author	Message
Oliver Melbourne Kel #1 / 5	Oracle vs SQL Server I would be interested in any ones opinion on the relative merits of Oracle vs. SQL Server. The system is to run a calling card application. There will be telecoms switches in different countries, which will either need to access a local server replicated from a main server, or to communicate with a remote server directly. Any opinions welcome. Oliver
Fri, 26 Mar 1999 03:00:00 GMT

Ron Denha #2 / 5	Oracle vs SQL Server Quote: > I would be interested in any ones opinion on the relative merits of > Oracle vs. SQL Server. > The system is to run a calling card application. There will be > telecoms switches in different countries, which will either need to > access a local server replicated from a main server, or to communicate > with a remote server directly. > Any opinions welcome. > Oliver If it needs to run on anything but NT, it had better be Oracle. --- Ron
Fri, 26 Mar 1999 03:00:00 GMT

Frank Ca #3 / 5	Oracle vs SQL Server Quote: >>> I would be interested in any ones opinion on the relative merits of Oracle vs. SQL Server ....The system is to run a calling card application.<<< Having worked on a similar system running under Sybase (which is a cousin of SQL Server), I would have to recommend Oracle because of its ability to lock records (as opposed to pages) and its more mature replication technology. OTOH, SQL Server will probably cost you less in terms of development and deployment unless you already have a good, Unix-based, infrastructure in your company. Frank Carr
Sat, 27 Mar 1999 03:00:00 GMT

Todd Verstrate #4 / 5	Oracle vs SQL Server Quote: > > I would be interested in any ones opinion on the relative merits of > > Oracle vs. SQL Server. > > The system is to run a calling card application. There will be > > telecoms switches in different countries, which will either need to > > access a local server replicated from a main server, or to communicate > > with a remote server directly. > > Any opinions welcome. > > Oliver > If it needs to run on anything but NT, it had better be Oracle. > --- Ron as a result, if its big, it needs to be oracle (or db2). Oracle also has beeter concurrency (i.e. handles more users hitting data that is close on the disk at the same time better).
Sat, 27 Mar 1999 03:00:00 GMT

David Marcea #5 / 5	Oracle vs SQL Server Quote: > I would be interested in any ones opinion on the relative merits of > Oracle vs. SQL Server. > The system is to run a calling card application. There will be > telecoms switches in different countries, which will either need to > access a local server replicated from a main server, or to communicate > with a remote server directly. > Any opinions welcome. > Oliver Screw both of them try looking at ObjectStore. www.odi.com
Sun, 28 Mar 1999 03:00:00 GMT

Page 1 of 1

[ 5 post ]