
How reliable is Active Reports compared to Crystal Reports
Quote:
>I want to write reports for Visual Basic using 'Active Reports'. This
>product seems much easier to use than Crystal Reports. But how reliable is
>it compared to Crystal Reports? Are there a lot of problems, bugs etc.
I have used Crystal Reports (worst GUI in the industry) since VB3.
Started using Data Dynamics' ActiveReports (AR) about two months ago.
Some bugs, but so far there are workable alternatives. What is cool is
to write real VB code (code that can be maintained). Crystal Reports
does too much behind the scenes and if you don't like what it does,
tough luck. Passing parameters to Crystal (at least through version
6.x) sucks big time. Crystal's mapping to DAO is moronic at best--
change the table structure and you must recompile the report. Unless
reflected in the result set of the query, ActiveReports could care
less about changes to the table structure.
I *never* use bound controls. Although AR can bind with controls on a
report, unbound reports are easily created. In my opinion, AR's GUI
is far better than Crystal Reports and much easier to lay out (and
change) a report. The runtime viewer (freely distributable) is light
weight (under 300k). On projects involving identical reports, one set
written in Crystal Reports, the other in ActiveReports, distribution
overhead with AR is about six megabytes less. You can store multiple
AR reports in an ActiveX dll. One negative note: the ActiveReports
object is defined at run-time (late bound).
I haven't tried Data Dynamics' support yet--my policy is to work with
a control / product for a couple of months before trying the support
lottery. Data Dynamics is reportedly working out all existing bugs
before enhancing the product further. That, in itself, is a rather
remarkable philosophy in the software industry.
****** AllenL ********************************************************
In a nation ruled by swine, all pigs are upward-mobile...
Hunter S. Thompson (b. 1939), U.S. journalist.