I'll {*filter*}in here; I've loaded Outlook 2K as a standalone. I bought ONLY
the Outlook 2K, not the full Office 2K. Install to a different directory
from the Office 97.
If you have Outlook 97/98 already installed, the install will offer to
replace it.
So far, I have had zero problems with O2K and Office 97 coexisting. Then
again, I've got a system at work that has both Office 97 and Office 2K
(no Outlook in either) running. Only problem I've run into with that is
that Office 2K always trys to do an install after I've run the same
program in Office 97.
HTH
Quote:
> Thanks. Do you think there would be a problem if I only loaded Outlook 2000,
> and left the remainder of my Office 97 intact?
> All of my clients are on Office 97 and the VBA programming I am doing is for
> Word 97. I don't want to starting messing things up and having possible
> compatibility problems (I keep reading "same file format", "no, different file
> format", "no, same file format", "no, different file format", so I don't know
> who to believe any more!)
> Thanks!
> --JoJo
> > Outlook 2000 offers a much richer object model and native VBA, rather than
> > just the ability to be called from VBA in other apps.
> > --
> > Sue Mosher
> > Author of
> > "Teach Yourself Microsoft Outlook 2000 Programming in 24 Hours"
> > "Microsoft Outlook 2000 E-mail and Fax Guide"
> > Outlook and Exchange solutions at http://www.*-*-*.com/
> > > Dear Folks,
> > > I have Outlook 98 installed, and I have Office 2000 on CD-ROM which I
> > > have not yet installed.
> > > Opinions on whether I should install Outlook 2000 ??? I have no data.
> > > I don't know what's different about it.
> > > I'm especially interested in programmability.
> --
> READ ALL ABOUT IT at . . . http://www.*-*-*.com/
> VBA-Word CODE SAMPLES for Newbies and other stuff !
--
Bruce H. Johnson
Corporate Knowledge, Inc. Los Angeles, California
#include <std_disclaimer>
Outlook 98 vs. 2000