Bring Back KnowledgeBase!
Author |
Message |
Steve Johnsto #1 / 17
|
 Bring Back KnowledgeBase!
Quote:
> I went to search for a simple document in the KB this morning, and lo > and behold, Microsoft has elected to change everything around -- I can't > access the useful, straightforward KB interface, instead I had to create > a user account, log in, and type a single query for the entire KB. > Don't they have better things to do with their time than break things > that were working fine? The combination of bureaucratic overhead on the > new site and the fact that the search mechanism returns scads of false > positives has cost me about 45 minutes today. > Andy Perrin > UC Berkeley, Demography
But this way Micro$oft can sell more copies of Technet...
|
Tue, 21 Mar 2000 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
Andrew J. Perri #2 / 17
|
 Bring Back KnowledgeBase!
I went to search for a simple document in the KB this morning, and lo and behold, Microsoft has elected to change everything around -- I can't access the useful, straightforward KB interface, instead I had to create a user account, log in, and type a single query for the entire KB. Don't they have better things to do with their time than break things that were working fine? The combination of bureaucratic overhead on the new site and the fact that the search mechanism returns scads of false positives has cost me about 45 minutes today. Andy Perrin UC Berkeley, Demography
|
Tue, 21 Mar 2000 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
Pete #3 / 17
|
 Bring Back KnowledgeBase!
You think you're upset? I foolishly paid hundreds of dollars last year for a subscription to the MSDN Professional version, and now the entire thing, including the MSKB, is out there for free on the 'net!!! Oh, yeah, I forgot, it's about two months behind what I get in my subscription, so I guess that makes it worth the five large I donated to MS. -- Pete B
Quote: > I went to search for a simple document in the KB this morning, and lo > and behold, Microsoft has elected to change everything around -- I can't > access the useful, straightforward KB interface, instead I had to create > a user account, log in, and type a single query for the entire KB. > Don't they have better things to do with their time than break things > that were working fine? The combination of bureaucratic overhead on the > new site and the fact that the search mechanism returns scads of false > positives has cost me about 45 minutes today. > Andy Perrin > UC Berkeley, Demography
|
Wed, 22 Mar 2000 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
Tony Toe #4 / 17
|
 Bring Back KnowledgeBase!
Quote: >I went to search for a simple document in the KB this morning, and lo >and behold, Microsoft has elected to change everything around --
Cripes. Another useful tool by Mickeysoft! Visit www.microsoft.com/msaccesssupport and download the knowledge base onto your own system. Tony ---- Message posted to newsgroup and emailed. Tony Toews, Independent Computer Consultant The Year 2000 crisis: Will my parents or your grand parents still be receiving their pension in January, 2000? See www.granite.ab.ca/year2000 for more info. Microsoft Access Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems at www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm
|
Wed, 22 Mar 2000 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
R. J. Eim #5 / 17
|
 Bring Back KnowledgeBase!
Amen! Jay On Fri, 03 Oct 1997 09:29:59 -0700, "Andrew J. Perrin" Quote:
>I went to search for a simple document in the KB this morning, and lo >and behold, Microsoft has elected to change everything around -- I can't >access the useful, straightforward KB interface, instead I had to create >a user account, log in, and type a single query for the entire KB. >Don't they have better things to do with their time than break things >that were working fine? The combination of bureaucratic overhead on the >new site and the fact that the search mechanism returns scads of false >positives has cost me about 45 minutes today. >Andy Perrin >UC Berkeley, Demography
R. J. Eimer Consulting Specializing in MS-Access Databases Tulsa, OK
|
Wed, 22 Mar 2000 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
Stephen Fort #6 / 17
|
 Bring Back KnowledgeBase!
Here Here -- Stephen Forte President NYC Access VB Users Group www.nycaccessvb.com Jet Web: www.orcs.com/access97 Quote:
>Amen! >Jay >On Fri, 03 Oct 1997 09:29:59 -0700, "Andrew J. Perrin"
>>I went to search for a simple document in the KB this morning, and lo >>and behold, Microsoft has elected to change everything around -- I can't >>access the useful, straightforward KB interface, instead I had to create >>a user account, log in, and type a single query for the entire KB. >>Don't they have better things to do with their time than break things >>that were working fine? The combination of bureaucratic overhead on the >>new site and the fact that the search mechanism returns scads of false >>positives has cost me about 45 minutes today. >>Andy Perrin >>UC Berkeley, Demography
>R. J. Eimer Consulting >Specializing in MS-Access Databases >Tulsa, OK
|
Thu, 23 Mar 2000 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
Arvin Meye #7 / 17
|
 Bring Back KnowledgeBase!
Quote: > The combination of bureaucratic overhead on the > new site and the fact that the search mechanism returns scads of false > positives has cost me about 45 minutes today.
The new "Knowledge Base" is a study in maximum suckage. Any developer working for me who even proposed the site as it now appears, would be replaced by a high school intern. Our firm has several subscriptions to TechNet and MSDN, but I at least, rely on the Knowledge Base for the fastest, most up-to-date information. That is now gone! Where is the Q number search? Where is the ability to refine or expand by using the references within an article? I spent 2 hours of otherwise billable time doing a search which should have taken less than 5 minutes. Look at the posters complaining here! We are not your neophyte desktop users. We are professional developers, trying to do our jobs efficiently. Who did the usability study on this piece of junk anyway? -- Arvin Meyer
|
Fri, 24 Mar 2000 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
Ken Ge #8 / 17
|
 Bring Back KnowledgeBase!
Quote: > I foolishly paid hundreds of dollars last year for > a subscription to the MSDN Professional version, and now the entire thing, > including the MSKB, is out there for free on the 'net!!! Oh, yeah, I > forgot, it's about two months behind what I get in my subscription, so I > guess that makes it worth the five large I donated to MS.
Well, I kinda agree, except that by the time I find what I want on the 'net, I could have loaded the CD, done a search, fixed the problem, and HAD LUNCH. It's just incredibly slow to search on the net. So I, for one, am still glad I shelled out 2K (for the big ol' MSDN). Although much of the content is on the web, it's too slow to be useful except for casual browsing. -- Ken
|
Fri, 24 Mar 2000 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
Arvin Meye #9 / 17
|
 Bring Back KnowledgeBase!
Quote: > Our firm has several subscriptions to TechNet and MSDN, but I at least, > rely on the Knowledge Base for the fastest, most up-to-date information. > That is now gone! Where is the Q number search? Where is the ability to > refine or expand by using the references within an article?
I just figured out how to get my Q numbers. Apparently, my "default" personal profile was obstructing Boolean searches. Of course, when I went to change the profile, I got "HTTP Application Error" Great work MS! Keep it up, and see where it takes you. -- Arvin Meyer
|
Fri, 24 Mar 2000 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
Pete #10 / 17
|
 Bring Back KnowledgeBase!
Amen x1000 to Mr Meyer's comments about the books saving the day! I agree with Ken that the books are cheap at any price (and they are really not as costly as most technical Windows manuals). I am fortunate that I work in a place that agrees such items are the equivalent of the tools used by a craftsman to do his job. If one app problem is resolved using the books, or one conference attended for however-many-bucks brings back one new approach to satisfying a company need, then the money is extremely well spent. I have designed more than one app, using ideas from these various sources, that has been universally adapted across our entire globally-located company, saving thousands of dollars in time over the previous methods used to accomplish the same thing. And I second the other question posed by Mr. Meyer: Whence an Access '97 HOW-TO??? -- Pete B
Quote: > That's exactly what I was saying Ken $50 is a lot of money for a book, but > dirt cheap when you need an answer. I know your percentage of the price is > ridiculously small, as a matter of fact I declined to write one for Que on > NT for that reason. I've saved thousands of dollars worth of time with your > books. I own every one of them. They've saved my bacon, a hundred times > over their cost. There is no way that I could write and debug the code for > even one large routine for $50. Even if money was an issue, your books > would still be the first I'd buy. > I wrote Waite months ago with a complaint about their short-sightedness. > Your books are indispensible. Keep writing them, and I'll keep buying them. > BTW, I've heard rumors of an Access97 "How-To". Are they true, and if so > when? > -- > Arvin Meyer
> > says... > > > They are like your books, expensive, but dirt cheap when > > > you need a good, reliable answer fast. Our clients pay well for our > time, I > > > try not to waste even a minute of it. > > Expensive? DOn't get me started (well, you did...) > > So a book costs $50 or so. How much do you bill at? Most likely, more > > than that per hour. So if you save EVEN ONE HOUR by buying a book, it > > pays for itself. And I can't see how almost any book you could buy > > wouldn't save you one hour of work. I can't think of any computer book > > that I own that hasn't paid for itself nearly instantly. Of course, I > > only buy books that are useful to me... > > So don't give me that "expensive" stuff <g> -- Ken
|
Fri, 24 Mar 2000 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
Ken Ge #11 / 17
|
 Bring Back KnowledgeBase!
says... Quote: > BTW, I've heard rumors of an Access97 "How-To". Are they true, and if so > when?
Not looking good. At least not in the 97 timeframe. We'll most certainly (he says, not really knowing) do one for the next version, I believe. - Ken
|
Fri, 24 Mar 2000 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
Michel Wals #12 / 17
|
 Bring Back KnowledgeBase!
Hi, seems to be relocated. If you have access to this Newsgroup, you can probably find it back (see "Search Support Online" tab). Sends the thanks to IE4 (increased security?). Hope it may help, Vanderghast, Access MVP.
Quote: > I went to search for a simple document in the KB this morning, and lo > and behold, Microsoft has elected to change everything around -- I can't > access the useful, straightforward KB interface, instead I had to create > a user account, log in, and type a single query for the entire KB. > Don't they have better things to do with their time than break things > that were working fine? The combination of bureaucratic overhead on the > new site and the fact that the search mechanism returns scads of false > positives has cost me about 45 minutes today. > Andy Perrin > UC Berkeley, Demography
|
Fri, 24 Mar 2000 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
Ken Ge #13 / 17
|
 Bring Back KnowledgeBase!
says... Quote: > They are like your books, expensive, but dirt cheap when > you need a good, reliable answer fast. Our clients pay well for our time, I > try not to waste even a minute of it.
Expensive? DOn't get me started (well, you did...) So a book costs $50 or so. How much do you bill at? Most likely, more than that per hour. So if you save EVEN ONE HOUR by buying a book, it pays for itself. And I can't see how almost any book you could buy wouldn't save you one hour of work. I can't think of any computer book that I own that hasn't paid for itself nearly instantly. Of course, I only buy books that are useful to me... So don't give me that "expensive" stuff <g> -- Ken
|
Fri, 24 Mar 2000 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
Arvin Meye #14 / 17
|
 Bring Back KnowledgeBase!
Quote: > Well, I kinda agree, except that by the time I find what I want on the > 'net, I could have loaded the CD, done a search, fixed the problem, and > HAD LUNCH. It's just incredibly slow to search on the net. So I, for > one, am still glad I shelled out 2K (for the big ol' MSDN). Although much > of the content is on the web, it's too slow to be useful except for > casual browsing. -- Ken
I disagree Ken, I have an ISDN connection with a shortcut set up to the Knowledge Base, I can get in and start my search faster than putting the CD in the drive (10 or 15 seconds), that is if I could find the CD in the office quickly in the first place. And the CD's don't have the "latest and greatest" It never takes more than 5 minutes (at least until now) to find an existing article in the KB. Don't get me wrong, I wouldn't ever quit the MSDN or TechNet subscriptions, they have a helluva lot more on them than the Knowledge Base, and are well worth their price. They are like your books, expensive, but dirt cheap when you need a good, reliable answer fast. Our clients pay well for our time, I try not to waste even a minute of it. -- Arvin Meyer
|
Fri, 24 Mar 2000 03:00:00 GMT |
|
 |
Arvin Meye #15 / 17
|
 Bring Back KnowledgeBase!
That's exactly what I was saying Ken $50 is a lot of money for a book, but dirt cheap when you need an answer. I know your percentage of the price is ridiculously small, as a matter of fact I declined to write one for Que on NT for that reason. I've saved thousands of dollars worth of time with your books. I own every one of them. They've saved my bacon, a hundred times over their cost. There is no way that I could write and debug the code for even one large routine for $50. Even if money was an issue, your books would still be the first I'd buy. I wrote Waite months ago with a complaint about their short-sightedness. Your books are indispensible. Keep writing them, and I'll keep buying them. BTW, I've heard rumors of an Access97 "How-To". Are they true, and if so when? -- Arvin Meyer
Quote:
> says... > > They are like your books, expensive, but dirt cheap when > > you need a good, reliable answer fast. Our clients pay well for our time, I > > try not to waste even a minute of it. > Expensive? DOn't get me started (well, you did...) > So a book costs $50 or so. How much do you bill at? Most likely, more > than that per hour. So if you save EVEN ONE HOUR by buying a book, it > pays for itself. And I can't see how almost any book you could buy > wouldn't save you one hour of work. I can't think of any computer book > that I own that hasn't paid for itself nearly instantly. Of course, I > only buy books that are useful to me... > So don't give me that "expensive" stuff <g> -- Ken
|
Fri, 24 Mar 2000 03:00:00 GMT |
|
|
Page 1 of 2
|
[ 17 post ] |
|
Go to page:
[1]
[2] |
|